| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Your Online Resource for Diabetes Treatment
Home > Literature
Alerts > Age at initiation and frequency of scree...
Age at initiation and frequency of screening to detect type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis BACKGROUND: No clinical trials have assessed the effects or cost-effectiveness of sequential screening strategies to detect new cases of type 2 diabetes. We used a mathematical model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of several screening strategies. METHODS: We used person-specific data from a representative sample of the US population to create a simulated population of 325,000 people aged 30 years without diabetes. We used the Archimedes model to compare eight simulated screening strategies for with a no-screening control strategy. Strategies differed in terms of at initiation and frequency of screening. Once diagnosed, diabetes treatment was simulated in a standard manner. We calculated the effects of each strategy on the incidence of type 2 diabetes, myocardial infarction, stroke, and complications in addition to quality of life, costs, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). FINDINGS: Compared with no screening, all simulated screening strategies reduced the incidence of myocardial infarction (3-9 events prevented per 1000 people screened) and diabetes-related complications (3-9 events prevented per 1000 people), and increased the number of QALYs (93-194 undiscounted QALYs) added over 50 years. Most strategies prevented a significant number of simulated deaths (2-5 events per 1000 people). There was little or no effect of screening on incidence of stroke (0-1 event prevented per 1000 people). Five screening strategies had costs per of about US$10,500 or less, whereas costs were much higher for screening started at 45 years of and repeated every year ($15,509), screening started at 60 years of and repeated every 3 years ($25,738), or a maximum screening strategy (screening started at 30 years of and repeated every 6 months; $40,778). Several strategies differed substantially in the number of QALYs gained. Costs per were sensitive to the disutility assigned to the state of having diabetes diagnosed with or without symptoms. INTERPRETATION: In the US population, screening for is cost effective when started between the ages of 30 years and 45 years, with screening repeated every 3-5 years. PMID: 20356621 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Kahn R, Alperin P, Eddy D, et al. Age at initiation and frequency of screening to detect type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9723):1365-1374. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||